Thursday, February 26, 2009

Social Networking and Advertisements

Practically everyone (who's anyone) is on some sort of social networking site like Facebook or Myspace and it can be tricky to find ways to tap into this massive amount of users. According to a recent article on MediaPost, 43% of everyone who is online uses some sort of social networking. This is an amazing amount of people to advertise to and as this study points out, those social networkers are more likely to shop and spend more online than their peers. But it is tricky to get these users to actually look at your advertisement. This is why advertisers have to find even more creative ways to get this group of people to look, click and follow through. But if one can actually achieve this, then your clients business will boom.

Advertising To Social Networkers Tricky
by Jack Loechner, 13 minutes ago



A recent study by InsightExpress, exploring participation trends across social networks, as well as how receptive their members are to advertising, found that 43% of the online population reports using a social networking site. And, no matter their age or number of profiles, social networkers see ad

full article: http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&art_aid=100758#comments

This article has a really awesome break down chart of what social networking people do online and the percent that do it compared to those who do not belong to a social networking site.

Tuesday, February 24, 2009

CPMs are real

We've talked a bit about calculating CPMs. Do know....it's not just some textbook thing that
I've made up. Here's an article from Media Post, reporting that SQAD will start using CPM to measure effectiveness of online ads. Prior to CPM, click-through or cost-per-click were used.

While you're at it, take a look at the article and some info about SQAD.

Full article link: http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&art_aid=100865

Firing SQAD: Data Firm Sets 'CPM' As Online Ad Metric
Joe Mandese, Feb 24, 2009 07:31 AM
In a move that will likely align the ROI of online advertising more closely with that of traditional media such as television, an influential source of media marketplace data this morning announced it will use Madison Avenue's long-standing CPM, or cost-per-thousand, metric as the "currency" for tracking online advertising. The announcement by Tarrytown, NY-based SQAD, comes as other influential industry source are trying to reshape online media in the image of television, and as online industry insiders wage their own debate about the best metrics for evaluating the efficacy of their medium.

Instead of CPMs, which value a medium based on how much it costs to reach a thousand audience impressions, online media often is valued based on results or actions more akin to direct response of "performance"-based media, including CPC (cost-per-click) and CPA (cost-per-action) metrics.

But SQAD's initiative comes as Madison Avenue is racing to standardize its buying metrics for television, abandoning the decades-old CPP, or cost-per-point (as in TV rating points) metric for spot and local TV buys, and standardizing all local and national TV advertising deals around the CPM.

More about SQAD: http://www.sqad.com/

Sunday, February 22, 2009

ESPN Plans Local Sports Sites

I found this article on The Wall Street Journal and it discusses how the biggest sports cable network, ESPN, is capitalizing on the demise of local newspapers. ESPN announced the plan to launch ESPNChicago.com which is devoted to the Chicago sports scene. ESPN hopes their new site will be the first of many to break into the local markets. Since the Chicago Tribune and Chicago Sun- Times are going through hard times, the new site will give advertisers a popular new source to advertise on. The site already has one advertiser on board.


By Russell Adams

Add ESPN to the list of national news outlets positioning themselves to capitalize on the demise of local newspapers.

The “Worldwide Leader in Sports” this week said it plans to launch ESPNChicago.com, a Web site devoted to the Chicago sports scene. The site, scheduled to launch in April, will feature a daily Chicago version of “Sportscenter,” ESPN’s signature sports news show, and contributions from ESPN columnists and radio personalities with ties to the city.


http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2009/02/20/espn-plans-local-sports-sites/

Wednesday, February 18, 2009

Local Web-Ad Market Cools Down

I found this article on TVNewsday, and it discusses an interesting phenomenon that I wasn't even sure was going on in advertising: local ad Internet advertising. It was surprising to me that this had become such a successful tool. In recent times the struggles are setting in for it, like just about everything in this business, and they are looking for ways out of it. However, there are some initiatives to help these local companies that are being started.

Local ads have accounted for some of the fastest growth in Internet advertising in recent years, as small businesses from car-repair shops in Dallas to bakeries in Charlotte, N.C., have taken their marketing online.

This year, growth in the local-ad market -- which represents about a third of total online ad spending in the U.S. -- is expected to shrink, according to one key estimate, challenging the ad and media-buying shops that rely on the local Internet market.


A number of start-ups, including ReachLocal, Yodle and Spot Runner, have cropped up in the past few years, raising millions of dollars and building technologies to help local businesses make the most of their Internet ad buys. Meanwhile, more-established local-media companies, from newspapers to Yellow Pages directories, have scurried to retrain their sales forces to sell online ads alongside their traditional products.


http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123491660496304367.html?mod=WSJ_TimesEMEA

Tuesday, February 17, 2009

The Impending Doom for Radio? Wachovia analyst thinks so...

Everyone knows that radio isn't what it used to be but how soon, if ever, will radio fade into the background noise of today's new media convergence? Wachovia analyst Marci Ryvicker thinks that it will be sometime time soon because 2009 isn't proving to be any better than last year.

Wachovia Forecasts Radio Doom In '09 by Erik Sass,

If anyone is still cherishing hopes of a radio turnaround in 2009, Wachovia analyst Marci Ryvicker's latest note to investors should doom that idea. The outlook is overwhelmingly negative, as Ryvicker sees a 9% decline in revenues in 2008 followed by a further 13% decline in 2009.

"It's the same depressing story," Ryvicker noted. "Advertisers are cutting back significantly, given rising unemployment and the general state of the economy."....continue reading (http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&art_aid=100330)

The article goes on to talk about the dismal future for radio advertising for 2009 and even though the last figures from 2008 are not in yet, Ryvicker says it won't prove to be any different than the other quarters. The reason for this analyst's grim outlook is the lack of local and some national advertising for radio stations that used to be their bread and butter. Without the proper advertising, radio stations have very little options left and have started to defaulting on their loans. What could this mean? This might mean even more consolidation of radio stations by one company because they might want to take the chance to buy more radio stations at the cheap price their bank might be selling them for. This could cause even more harm to the radio station's programming and individuality.

I do believe that their will always be a place for radio in our society and communities but the traditional roles of the radio have long been gone. Only time will tell if the radio industry can keep up with the times. Until then, advertisers will continue to drop their dollars from radio because it will not be making them any money. And with the economy still in shambles and a recovery from it not in the near future, you will see more and more advertisers take their dollars some place else.

Thursday, February 12, 2009

NATPE Conference content

Here's the NATPE Conference video player page. You'll find conference video content on this page.

http://live.vimation.com/vim/?v_launch=natpe

ALSO, go to YouTube to view 9 NATPE Career Advice videos....here's a link:
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_type=&search_query=natpeed&aq=f

Fuzzy TV Future

The Wall Street Journal provided a great explanation of the shifting TV landscape in a front page article on Tuesday. "Local TV Stations Face a Fuzzy Future" describes the gradual shift in station-network relations and suggests a day when one or more networks may cut the distribution cord with local affiliates to provide programming directly to a cable channel. There are a number of issues at play, including: media conglomerates who need not share content with local stations, a surplus of over-the-air stations--that will expand further with the final shift to digital broadcasting, evolving devices for consuming content (think small and mobile), shifting consumer preferences--an entire generation versed in not only cable but broadband literate, and a changing production structure--the shift from expensive, scripted production to lower cost formats.

All of this changes the employment picture for college graduates. The bright spots: some sort of advertising sales need will exist--perhaps selling "spots" but maybe striking cross-platform and product tie-in deals. I'm sure there are other employment bright spots but I don't think traditional television production is one of them--not in an age of better, "smarter" production tools.

Here's the article link:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123422910357065971.html

And, some of the opening text:

LAS VEGAS -- Lisa Howfield, general manager of KVBC, the NBC affiliate here, watched last year as the broadcast-television business began to shrink. She started cutting. She combined departments. She made do with old equipment, and did away with luxuries like yearly sales getaways.

In December and January, she laid off 15 employees, or 6% of her staff. After the weatherman left last month, one of the morning news anchors took on both jobs. "It's like a bad roller-coaster ride," says Ms. Howfield. Her station's full-day viewership is down 7.7% this TV season from the same period last year, according to Nielsen Co., and Ms. Howfield expects her ad revenue in 2009 will be down 30% from 2008.

Local television stations like Ms. Howfield's dominated the TV business for more than half a century. They inspired the term "network": a web of Channel 7s and 11s that delivered shows from ABC, CBS, NBC -- and later, Fox -- plus local news, syndicated reruns and talk shows. Because the stations owned the licenses to the airwaves that broadcast TV signals, big networks couldn't distribute content without them. In turn, local stations became the vehicles for the greatest mass-market advertising blitz in history.

Click the link to read the full article.

Monday, February 9, 2009

'Saturday Night Live' Acts as Ad Agency for Pepsi

http://adage.com/madisonandvine/article?article_id=134349


NBC's Lorne Michaels and Co. Create Spots Based on 'MacGruber' Sketches

NEW YORK (AdAge.com) -- Live from New York, it's ... the latest upstart ad agency?

Madison Avenue is known for a litany of storied acronyms, such as BBDO and DDB. But is advertising's hallowed capital ready for another pair of familiar but eyebrow-raising initials: NBC and SNL? And could a show producer such as Lorne Michaels become the next sought-after creative director?

In a move that some viewers considered shocking, cast and crew from the Peacock Network's venerable "Saturday Night Live" crafted three ads for Pepsi that essentially grafted mentions, cans and logos of the famous soda into three different executions of "MacGruber," a long-running spoof of the old "MacGyver" TV series. The ads looked just like "SNL" skits but ran during commercial breaks on the Jan. 31 edition of the show. One of the ads also appeared during the recent Super Bowl. Pepsi's ad agency, Omnicom Group's TBWA/Chiat/Day, had little if any involvement in the commercials....

It seems the advertising model has changed yet again.  This time, fusing the ad sales department and the tv program production department together-creating a "fresh" approach to commercials.  

While the ad appears to be just another sketch for Will Forte and his "MacGruber" character, it's actually a commercial for Pepsi.  

The economy is the driving force in this model, determining how and why the commercial is created.  For Lorne Michaels, head honcho of SNL, it's a step forward to help NBC during these difficult times.  First, NBC doesn't have to pay an advertising agency for an ad concept because they're using their own intellectual property.  Second, Pepsi pays NBC-specifically SNL-for running the advertisement.  This "extra" money from Pepsi will most likely cover costs for new sets, props, lighting, ect.  What a huge difference that makes for NBC and Lorne Michaels along the way.  

The "MacGruber" Pepsi commercials received coveted positions during the Super Bowl, thus saving NBC millions of dollars and giving "MacGruber" fans a few laughs along the way.

NBC's Ben Silverman, co-chairman of entertainment, sees this as the future of advertising on television.  He claims that viewers can expect to see their favorite television characters pushing a brand in the next 30 sec ad spot.  

While this new venture is exciting and different, what happens to the ad agency in the process?  I don't think the economic hardships will completely destroy the advertising business.  But when the creative minds behind television's hottest shows are willing to take the time and develop commercials, who needs the suits at advertising agencies?


-Christina Colosimo

Sunday, February 8, 2009

Television: It's Like Confort Food

The New York Times--a media empire with a long history but is now struggling to keep itself afloat--featured this article in Sunday's online recommendations. As Maxwell Smart--who was originally a television character before the movie remake--might say, "Would you believe....that the typical American household has 2.7 persons but 2.9 TV sets and the typical American watched 142 hours of television per month?"

The actual article is called, "Why Television Still Shines in a World of Screens."

Why in this Internet world with the upcoming invasion of the small screens would this be happening? As newspaper sellers use to say, read all about it at:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/08/business/media/08digi.html?th&emc=th

gp

Friday, February 6, 2009

Ad Decline, Rise of Smartphones....

Click the link below to read the full article. As we think about where money will be spent on advertising, new media are always part of the discussion. Advertising professionals still see ad dollars shifting away from traditional media platforms...the figure they cite is about 1/4 of the ad budget migrating to non-traditional media from traditional platforms.

As you look for articles to blog about, find articles that offer an explanation of future ad spending or explanations of developing advertising platforms. The growth of mobile connectivity--smart phones--that will allow consumers to cut the cord from the television set will further change media use pattern, assuming a tight economy doesn't change demand.

http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&art_aid=99827


Story
Ad Decline, Rise Of Smartphones Seen As Biggest Trends
Mark Walsh, Feb 06, 2009 07:00 AM
mobile phonesThe pullback of ad spending and mobile phones becoming personal computers are the most "disruptive" force in media today, according to a new survey of media and advertising professionals by consulting giant KPMG.

Of the 200 executives polled by KPMG in connection with the AlwaysOn OnMedia NYC conference this week, nearly half cited the ad downturn as the industry's major trend, while 40% noted the growing use of cell phones for more than just talking. A close third was the thinning of "old media" through bankruptcies and closures (38%).

Survey participants were asked to choose from among six trends that also included Internet penetration opening up global markets (25%); the failure of social networks to monetize as expected (18%); and smartphones' potential for location-targeted content, advertising and marketing (17%).

The economic downturn also appears to have cooled enthusiasm for shifting ad dollars into digital media. While three-quarters expect more than a quarter of ad budgets moving away from traditional outlets in the next five years, that 75% is down from 90% a year ago.

Thursday, February 5, 2009

In Campaign Wars, Apple Still Has Microsoft’s Number

Hey guys, this is Nicole one of your lead bloggers for the week. I thought this article was interesting because even though we are going through dark economic times Apple is upping their advertisement spending. In fact Apple increased their marketing and advertising in the last 3 months of 2008 even though it was obvious that the economy was plummeting. Apple is using this time to take full advantage of the fact that recent ads for Microsoft have failed, and hopefully will push ahead of Microsoft. Although I think that Apple is making a risky move their market shares show that they have gained more than 2 percentage points in the last year and now controls nearly 10 percent of the overall market for personal computers. So they must be doing something right.


February 4, 2009
ADVERTISING
In Campaign Wars, Apple Still Has Microsoft’s Number

By BRAD STONE
TWENTY-FIVE years ago, Apple hurled a legendary marketing sledgehammer at I.B.M. personal computers that ran Microsoft software. During the 1984 Super Bowl, Apple ran a television ad that depicted those machines as instruments of Big Brotherish conformity. The ad was shown just once, but people still talk about it.

Today, Apple is still producing ads that hammer away at computers that run Microsoft’s software. But this time, Apple’s pounding is constant, even as Microsoft has been weakened by product stumbles and a series of ads that fell flat with the public.

While other technology companies curtail their ad budgets to ride out what appears to be an intense and protracted recession, Apple, based in Cupertino, Calif., said in its most recent earnings report that it actually increased marketing and advertising during the last three months of 2008, compared with the same period a year ago.

That has made Apple the second-most prolific technology advertiser, behind only Microsoft. During the first nine months of 2008, Apple’s ad spending vaulted to $133 million, surpassing Hewlett-Packard and I.B.M. — companies with three times Apple’s annual sales — according to the tracking firm TNS Media Intelligence. During the same period, Microsoft spent $191 million.

Apple’s ads promote what you can do with an iPhone or iPod, or show the comedian John Hodgman as a schlubby PC guy being outfoxed by the actor Justin Long as hip Mac guy.

There is good reason for Apple’s chief executive, Steven P. Jobs, and its longtime ad agency, TBWA/Chiat/Day, to be drawing these pointed contrasts: Microsoft, Apple’s longtime nemesis, is more vulnerable than it has been in years.

Microsoft’s current operating system, Windows Vista, is a well-known disappointment. And the replacement, Windows 7, will not be ready for regular users for at least six months, analysts say. Last month, Microsoft reported poor financial results and said it would lay off as many as 5,000 employees.

“Apple is trying to take as much advantage as they can during this period where there is a lot of confusion on the Windows side,” said Tim Bajarin, president of Creative Strategies and a longtime Apple watcher. “It wants to bring people into its retail stores and to contrast it to what they already know.”

Microsoft, for its part, said that Apple gave the attack ads a short rest late last year after Microsoft unveiled its counterattack. Microsoft’s campaign, devised by the agency Crispin, Porter & Bogusky, initially featured the comedian Jerry Seinfeld and Microsoft’s co-founder, Bill Gates, and then a diverse collection of normal people proudly proclaiming, “I am a PC.”

“I think we confused them a little bit by embracing the stigma they put on our brand and then taking it in a different direction,” said David Webster, a general manager at Microsoft.

An Apple spokesman declined to comment about either company’s advertising.



So far, Apple seems to be winning the fight. The Macintosh gained more than 2 percentage points of market share in the last year and now controls nearly 10 percent of the overall market for personal computers, according to the research firm Net Applications.

Apple’s ads have also fared better than Microsoft’s in the war for consumers’ hearts. In the last two months, Brand Keys, a market research company based in New York, queried 400 Apple and Microsoft users and measured their perceptions of Apple’s and Microsoft’s brand equity before and after seeing examples of the companies’ advertising.

Among the ads the firm showed were “Bean Counter,” an Apple spot that poked fun at Microsoft’s spending money on advertising instead of fixing product flaws. Brand Keys also surveyed responses to Microsoft’s first Seinfeld commercial, “Shoe Circus,” and the first “I am a PC” spot.

“Off the Air,” an ad that promised Apple stores would help customers switch from Windows to Apple’s Mac platform, was highly successful in lifting the brand equity that Apple users felt around the concept of “innovation, design and added value” — a factor that drives loyalty. The spot also improved PC users’ perception of Macs for their “trouble-free performance, service and support.”

On the other hand, Microsoft’s “Shoe Circus,” in which Mr. Seinfeld helped Mr. Gates buy shoes, failed miserably with consumers. After seeing the ad, both Apple and Microsoft users had a more negative perception of Microsoft in the areas of innovation, technology, trouble-free design, and warranty and pricing. “When you see an ad perform this poorly,” said Amy Shea, the executive vice president at Brand Keys who conducted the research, “you’ve got a real problem.”



The news was not all bad for Microsoft, though. “I am a PC” — the egalitarian response to Apple that Microsoft has settled on for its ongoing campaign — has worked well to lift PC users’ perception of the brand as technologically and environmentally advanced.

The message of the survey, Ms. Shea said, is that companies should play to their strengths, which in Microsoft’s case is the sheer ubiquity of its software around the world.

“Everyone who has a PC feels that they are very plugged in and that the world speaks almost one language,” she said. “Microsoft’s ability to tell that story visually by going around the world made that ad successful and positioned them as green and even cool.”

Apple, for its part, has played to its reputation as a hip, creative company, personified by Mr. Long’s straight-man performance as Mac Guy. The ads also fit with Apple’s 25-year history as a company willing to draw colorful juxtapositions against its larger, more powerful rivals.